Now at SIIM 2026 · Startup Kiosk 3 · June 10–12

Partner with Carina AI · Services from the team that ships the products

From research code to a clearable, deployable product

We're the team that built CuratAI and shipped INTContour and INTDose through FDA clearance. We work alongside research groups, hospitals, and medical-device companies on the same on-premise stack we use ourselves.

Where you are

Three places we usually meet partners

Most engagements come in through one of these doors. From there, the regulatory work follows when the clinical use calls for it.

"I have research data I want to use."

Studies, notes, registry forms, a clinical question. CuratAI goes up inside your firewall, wired to your sources, and hands back a research-ready cohort.

Data aggregation & de-identification →

"I need to clear an AI product for clinical use."

An AI product headed for the clinic. We've walked the 510(k) path twice — validation study design, predicate selection, submission preparation, post-market — and bring that lifecycle into the engagement.

Regulatory & 510(k) →

What we offer

Four services, one team

Mapped to the CuratAI workflow. The same engineers who wrote CuratAI staff every engagement — pick the subset you need.

Stages 1–3 · Retrieval, Ingest, De-identify

Data aggregation & de-identification

Stand CuratAI up inside your firewall. Connectors get configured against your PACS, EHR, pathology system, and research data sources — REDCap, Excel and CSV exports, registry pulls; the local LLM gets tuned to your registry's fields, and the de-identification rules to your data's quirks. By the end of the engagement, your team owns a working pipeline that turns raw clinical data into de-identified, structured research cohorts.

  • PACS / EHR / pathology connector setup
  • Research data ingest from REDCap, Excel/CSV, registry exports
  • Local LLM tuning for your target registry
  • De-identification rule customization across 5 PHI vectors
  • IRB-compatible audit + sharing configuration

Stage 4 · Annotate

Annotation & cohort building

Annotation is the bottleneck on every clinical-AI project. Multi-user projects get set up in CuratAI, the team gets trained on AI-assisted annotation, and the review workflow ships with QA gates baked in. When the workload outruns the team, our clinically-trained annotators step in as a managed service. When the question calls for data outside your walls, we tap an external network of imaging-data providers to assemble the cohort.

  • Annotation project + protocol design
  • AI-assisted annotation workflow training (prediction + interpolation)
  • Multi-user roles, reviewer queues, audit trails
  • Managed annotation by our clinical team (optional)
  • External imaging-data sourcing when the cohort needs to come from outside

Stage 5 · AI Plugins

Custom AI development

Full-spectrum clinical-AI engineering, augmented by the CuratAI platform that handles data plumbing, audit, and on-premise deployment. The team has shipped FDA-cleared AI on this stack twice; the same team and software come to your model. Optimization, benchmarking, and gap analysis are available as standalone engagements when you already have a model in hand.

  • Custom model training on your de-identified data
  • Retraining of FDA-cleared products (INTContour, OncoAI) on your protocols
  • Performance benchmarking + gap analysis on existing models
  • Algorithm optimization for accuracy, latency, and clinical workflow fit
  • Packaging as a CuratAI plugin or standalone on-premise deployment

See: Mayo Arizona INTContour retraining →

Stage 6 · Collaborate · into the clinic

Regulatory & 510(k)

From research code to a clearable product. We've shipped two FDA 510(k)-cleared products (INTContour K212274, INTDose K213137) and run the full lifecycle: pre-registered validation study design, predicate selection, pre-submission consultations with FDA, submission preparation, deficiency-letter response, post-market surveillance. The validation tooling we built for our own clearances comes with the engagement: action-logged annotation, automated metric computation against the reference standard, statistical analysis for substantial equivalence. It produces an FDA-conforming evaluation report straight out of the run.

  • Pre-registered validation study design + statistical analysis plan
  • Pre-submission (Q-Sub) consultations with FDA
  • Predicate selection & substantial-equivalence argument
  • Risk assessment and cybersecurity content for the submission dossier
  • Auto-generated, FDA-conforming evaluation reports from validation runs
  • 510(k) submission preparation and deficiency-letter response
  • Post-market surveillance + change-control process

Why us

The team that built it, working with yours

Two products through FDA clearance

INTContour (K212274) and INTDose (K213137) both shipped in 2022. 40+ peer-reviewed publications and 5+ NIH SBIR awards along the way. We've done validation studies, predicate filings, and deficiency-letter rounds for our own products — that experience comes with the engagement.

Same team that wrote the platform

The engineers who built CuratAI are the ones staffing the project. When edge cases come up on your data, they get fixed in the product.

Inside the firewall by default

Every CuratAI deployment lives inside an academic medical center's network. On-prem isn't a deployment option we offer; it's how the software is built.

How we work

A six-step pattern

Applies whether the engagement is a one-off data-curation setup or a full path to FDA clearance. Each step has a clear deliverable; you can stop after any of them.

  1. Scope. Define the clinical task, the input data, the success criteria, and the right end point (research-use, internal deployment, 510(k), De Novo).
  2. Cohort. Curate the training and validation cohorts with proper IRB oversight and PHI handling. CuratAI accelerates this when the data is yours; our data-provider network covers the gaps when it isn't.
  3. Build. Annotate, model, iterate — against pre-registered metrics, on your hardware, inside your firewall.
  4. Validate. Run the formal validation study against the pre-registered protocol. Analyze results. Generate the FDA-conforming evaluation report. Publish, if that fits.
  5. Ship. Deploy as a CuratAI plugin, a standalone tool, or (when the pathway calls for it) a 510(k) submission and clearance.
  6. Support. Monitoring, version control, the change-control process. Whatever's needed to keep the model trustworthy in the field.

Who we work with

Three audiences. One stack

Research groups at AMCs

PIs and informatics teams who need a research data pipeline that survives IRB review. Common starting point: CuratAI deployment + initial cohort curation. Examples on file: Mayo Clinic Platform, Mayo Arizona, U Colorado, U Penn.

Medical-device companies

Teams with a clinical model and a path to market, looking for a partner that understands both the engineering and the FDA's expectations. Common starting point: validation study design or 510(k) prep.

Imaging informatics & IT

Hospital IT and imaging-informatics directors deploying CuratAI or one of the FDA-cleared products at institutional scale. Common starting point: integration with existing PACS / EHR / TPS, on-prem deployment, audit configuration.

What are you working on?

Send us a couple of lines about the project. We'll come back within a week with a scoping summary and a rough timeline.